This is too good to be true, and couldn't happen to a nicer guy. I can hardly believe it! Is this real?!
Marquette suspends prof’s teaching, orders him off campus
(McAdams gets his "Dear John," letter)
Dear John:
The university is continuing to review your conduct and during this period — and until further notice — you are relieved of all teaching duties and all other faculty activities, including, but not limited to, advising, committee work, faculty meetings and any activity that would involve your interaction with Marquette students, faculty and staff. Should any academic appeals arise from Fall 2014 semester, however, you are expected to fulfill your obligations in that specific matter.
Your salary and benefits will continue at their current level during this time.
You are to remain off campus during this time, and should you need to come to campus, you are to contact me in writing beforehand to explain the purpose of your visit, to obtain my consent and to make appropriate arrangements for that visit. I am enclosing with this letter Marquette’s harassment policy, its guiding values statement, the University mission statement, and sections from the Faculty Handbook, which outline faculty rights and responsibilities; these documents will inform our review of your conduct.
Sincerely,
…
Dean
In November, Prof. John McAdams
(Marquette political science) — who blogs at Marquette Warrior — wrote a post
critical of a philosophy instructor, Cheryl Abbate.
(Abbate is a graduate student but was apparently the sole
instructor for the particular section of the Theory of Ethics class,
as is not uncommon for undergraduate courses at research universities.) The
post faulted Abbate for allegedly not allowing criticism of homosexuality in
class discussions (the quotes appear to be from the student who had approached
McAdams to complain about Abbate):
Abbate explained that “some
opinions are not appropriate, such as racist opinions, sexist opinions” and
then went on to ask “do you know if anyone in your class is homosexual?” And
further “don’t you think it would be offensive to them” if some student raised
his hand and challenged gay marriage? The point being, apparently that any gay
classmates should not be subjected to hearing any disagreement with their
presumed policy views.
Then things deteriorated further as
the student said that it was his right as an American citizen to make arguments
against gay marriage. Abbate replied that “you don’t have a right in this class
to make homophobic comments.”
She further said she would “take
offense” if the student said that women can’t serve in particular roles. And
she added that somebody who is homosexual would experience similar offense if
somebody opposed gay marriage in class.
She went on “In this class,
homophobic comments, racist comments, will not be tolerated.” She then invited
the student to drop the class.
Which the student is doing.
The post also claimed that the
administration wasn’t taking the student’s complaints seriously. The story got
some media attention, and harsh public criticism for Abbate (including some
anonymous comments that appeared to be threatening); Inside Higher Ed
has a detailed story on the subject.
Now, McAdams has gotten this letter
from the Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences:
Dear John:
The university is continuing to
review your conduct and during this period — and until further notice — you are
relieved of all teaching duties and all other faculty activities, including,
but not limited to, advising, committee work, faculty meetings and any activity
that would involve your interaction with Marquette students, faculty and staff.
Should any academic appeals arise from Fall 2014 semester, however, you are
expected to fulfill your obligations in that specific matter.
Your salary and benefits will
continue at their current level during this time.
You are to remain off campus during
this time, and should you need to come to campus, you are to contact me in
writing beforehand to explain the purpose of your visit, to obtain my consent
and to make appropriate arrangements for that visit. I am enclosing with this
letter Marquette’s harassment policy, its guiding values statement, the
University mission statement, and sections from the Faculty Handbook, which
outline faculty rights and responsibilities; these documents will inform our
review of your conduct.
Sincerely,
…
Dean
The letter doesn’t specifically
indicate what McAdams is being investigated for; and no passages in the
documents that the dean attached were highlighted in a way that suggests
specific details on this. But McAdams
believes that this suspension and removal from campus must have been caused by
the earlier post: “Since we have done nothing particularly controversial lately
besides blog about the Philosophy instructor (one Cheryl Abbate), we
have to assume that’s what it is about.” And Marquette seems to support this; I
wrote them last night saying, “Prof. McAdams’ Dec. 16 post suggests that the
paid suspension and the exclusion from campus was triggered entirely by his Nov.
9 post. But of course if there’s more to the story, I’d love to know.”
Marquette responded by saying:
Given that professor John McAdams
has shared his personnel information on his public blog, we are sharing the
following information:
Last month, Marquette University
began reviewing both a concern raised by a student and a concern raised by a
graduate student teaching assistant. While this review continues, professor
John McAdams has been relieved of his teaching duties and other faculty duties.
His salary and benefits will continue during the course of the review.
Our president has been very clear,
including in a recent campus-wide letter, about university expectations and
Guiding Values to which all faculty and staff are required to adhere, and in
which the dignity and worth of each member of our community is respected,
especially students.
“This is a matter of official
policy, but it is also a matter of our values,” President Michael R. Lovell
said in his letter to the campus community. “Respect is at the heart of our
commitment to the Jesuit tradition and Catholic social teaching.”
Lovell noted that Marquette listens
to any member of the campus community who expresses concerns alleging
inappropriate behavior. As stated in our harassment policy, the university will
not tolerate personal attacks or harassment of or by students, faculty and
staff.
“To be clear, we will take action
to address those concerns.” he said. “We deplore hatred and abuse directed at a
member of our community in any format.”
The university has protocols in
place for students who have concerns related to academic matters or any other
issues. Faculty members who express concerns alleging harassment may also refer
concerns through standard channels of authority – an associate dean, dean of
the college or the provost.
Given that the university’s actions
seem to be based just on McAdams’s criticism of another instructor (though I’d
love to hear more from readers who know any further facts on all this) those
actions strikes me as quite improper. Marquette is a private university, and
thus not bound by the First Amendment; and Wisconsin is not one of the
states that generally restricts private employer retaliation based
on an employee’s speech. Still, Marquette frames itself as a university that
respects academic freedom and free speech rights. Acting this way towards a
faculty member who publicly expresses his opinions on an important issue,
including when the issue involves what he sees as improper suppression of
student views by a colleague, stifles that freedom.
No comments:
Post a Comment